2020 Delhi riots: 4 acquitted as court finds police testimony unreliable
The accused faced trial in arson & vandalism, but the court held that the prosecution failed to prove the charges against them.
PTI
-
The prosecution relied on CCTV footage & police testimony, claiming that a mob attacked an auto driver & set the vehicle & shop on fire (PTI)
New Delhi, 20 May
A Delhi court has acquitted four men accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case, saying it would be "dangerous" to rely on the testimonies of two police personnel as their versions were contradicted by the investigation record and other evidence.
Additional
Sessions Judge Parveen Singh was hearing the case against Sumit Kumar, Anuj,
Rahul and Sachin in a case related to the alleged burning of an auto-rickshaw
and vandalising and setting ablaze a shop in Karawal Nagar during the riots.
In an
order dated 19 May, the court said, "I find that PW6 and PW7 (police
officers) are not credible witnesses and it will be dangerous to rely upon
their testimonies and find for the prosecution against the accused. I
accordingly find that the prosecution has failed to prove its case against the
accused."
According
to the prosecution, complainant Wazid had alleged that rioters set his
auto-rickshaw on fire on 25 February 2020, while another complainant,
Shamshad, alleged that his shop was vandalised and torched by rioters.
The
prosecution claimed CCTV footage helped identify the accused and relied mainly
on the testimonies of police personnel HC Mithilesh and ASI Junaid, who
claimed to have witnessed a mob attacking an auto driver and torching the
vehicle and shop.
An FIR was
registered at the Karawal Nagar police station, and charges of rioting, unlawful
assembly, disobedience to an order duly promulgated by a public servant and mischief causing damage were framed against all the accused.
The court,
however, found serious discrepancies in the evidence and noted that complainant
Wazid could not be produced during the trial. It also observed that Shamshad
had said that the incident at his shop occurred in his absence, and he could not
identify any person involved in the rioting or arson.
"Even
if the electronic evidence which has been produced by the prosecution in the
form of CCTV footage is accepted to be true, the CCTV footage does not pertain
to any of the incidents on the basis of which charges have been framed in this
case," the judge said.
The court
further noted that while the police witnesses claimed they saw the burning of
the auto at Karawal Nagar Chowk, investigation records showed the actual
location was about 1.5 km away on Pushta Road.
"The
testimonies of both these witnesses are completely falsified by what had been
deposed by the IOs (investigating officers) about the place of the
incident," the court said.
The court subsequently acquitted the four accused of all charges.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




