SC denies bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in Delhi riots case
The KA Najeeb case is a landmark Supreme Court ruling delivered in 2021 regarding bail under the UAPA
PTI
-
In the Delhi riots case, the SC granted bail to several accused but denied relief to activists Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam (PTI)
New Delhi, 18 May
Observing that bail is the rule and jail an exception even in UAPA cases, the Supreme Court on Monday granted bail to a man allegedly involved in drug trafficking and financing terror in Jammu and Kashmir.
A bench of
Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan granted relief to Handwara resident
Syed Iftikhar Andrabi in a high-profile narco-terror case. It directed him to
surrender his passport and report to the local police station once every 15 days.
The NIA is
investigating the case filed in 2020 under relevant sections of the Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act and the IPC.
The top court said Section 43D(5) of the UAPA cannot justify indefinite incarceration
and must operate subject to Articles 21 and 22. The section outlines stringent
bail restrictions.
Disapproving of the judgment delivered by a two-judge bench in the Gulfisha Fatima case
about the Delhi riots, the apex court said it did not properly follow the judgment in the KA Najeeb case, which recognised a long delay in trial as a ground for
bail in cases under the UAPA.
In the
Delhi riots case, the top court had granted bail to several accused, but
activists Umar Khalid and Sharejeel Imam were denied the relief.
"Bail
the rule and jail the exception is a constitutional principle flowing from
articles 21 and 22, and the presumption of innocence is the cornerstone of any
civilised society governed by rule of law," the bench said.
"We
have no manner of doubt in stating that even under the UAPA, bail is the rule
and jail is the exception. Of course, in an appropriate case, bail can be
denied having regard to the facts of that particular case," it added.
The apex
court made it clear that its judgement in the KA Najeeb case is a binding law
and cannot be diluted, circumvented or disregarded by trial courts, high courts
or even by benches of a lower strength of this court.
The KA
Najeeb case is a landmark Supreme Court ruling delivered in 2021 regarding bail
under the UAPA.
Andrabi
had challenged an order passed by the High Court of J&K and Ladakh, which
dismissed his bail plea, saying the scrutiny of cellphone records indicated
that Andrabi had been in touch with terror operatives across the border.
Narrating
the sequence of events leading to the apprehension of the accused, the NIA had
said that on June 11 2020, the police intercepted a car belonging to Abdul
Momin Peer at Kairo Bridge, Handwara. During the search, Rs 20.01 lakh cash and two
kg of heroin were seized, and Peer was arrested.
Later, on
his disclosure, Andrabi and Islam-Ul-Haq Peer were arrested.
Investigation
revealed that the accused were allegedly involved in cross-border smuggling and
supply of heroin in Jammu and Kashmir and other parts of the country after
procuring the same from their associates based in Pakistan, the charge-sheet
said.
Andrabi
and Abdul Momin Peer had visited Pakistan several times during 2016-17 to meet
the operatives of terrorist organisations, Lashkar-e-Taiba and Hizbul
Mujahideen (HM), it said, adding the amount generated from the sale of heroin
was used by the accused to further the terrorist activities of Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




