BENGALURU, 30 DEC

Judges must only evaluate the evidence collected by the investigating officer (IO) to assess its sufficiency, the Karnataka High Court has said.

In a judgment delivered by Justice HP Sandesh recently, the court emphasised the limited scope for revising discharge applications. It noted that conducting a "mini-trial" during such proceedings is not permissible, and arguments from the defense cannot be taken into account.

This ruling came while dismissing a revision petition filed by Dr Mohankumar M, who faced allegations of abetting an offense under Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Dr Mohankumar was accused of facilitating a payment of Rs 25 lakh to secure an MD (Pediatrics) admission at MS Ramaiah Medical College for the daughter of Accused No. 1 Dr C Anisha Roy.

The petitioner contended that the payment was a financial favour to Accused No. 1, who had sought assistance for his daughter's education. The payment was made directly to the institution via RTGS, and he denied receiving any money back from Accused No. 1, he argued.

The petitioner argued that providing financial help should not be interpreted as abetment. He also noted that Accused Nos. 3 and 5 had been discharged by the trial court on similar grounds and sought discharge for himself.

The prosecution pointed out that Rs 17.5 lakh in cash had been deposited into Dr Mohankumar's account prior to the Rs 25 lakh payment, which was not reflected in his tax filings.

Justice Sandesh remarked, "The criteria applied to others do not benefit the petitioner, as no explanation has been provided for the deposited cash." —PTI