Why target only Air India? SC junks plea for safety audit
The petitioner at the Supreme Court claimed to be a victim of 'some unfortunate incident' with Air India.
PTI
-
London-bound Air India flight from Ahmedabad crashed on 12 June, minutes after take-off. Photo: PTI
New Delhi, 8 Aug
The Supreme Court on Friday refused to hear a plea to
appoint a retired top court judge for examining Air India's safety practices
among other aspects and asked the petitioner why target the airline that
witnessed an "unfortunate tragedy".
The SC told the petitioner in-person, Narendera Kumar
Goswami to withdraw his PIL and asked him to move the appropriate forum in case
of grievances.
"Don't give the impression that you are playing with
other airlines. Why target Air India only which recently witnessed an
unfortunate tragedy? If you want some regulatory mechanism in place, then why
did you not make other airlines as party in your petition? Why only AirIndia?" the bench asked Goswami, a lawyer.
The petitioner claimed to be a victim of "some
unfortunate incident" with the airline.
Justice Kant then told him, "We also travel every week
and know what the status is. There was a tragedy, a very unfortunate one. This
is not a time to run down an airline."
Goswami in his PIL, which he filed in July, sought
directions for constituting an independent committee, headed by a retired
Supreme Court judge to examine Air India's safety practices, maintenance
procedures, and operational protocols, with a report to be submitted within
three months.
He also sought a direction for a comprehensive safety audit
of Air India's entire fleet by an international aviation safety agency
accredited by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), addressing
deficiencies identified in the 2024 ICAO audit report, to be completed within
six months.
Additionally, Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA)
was sought to be directed to implement and enforce a transparent, publicly
accessible reporting system for all aviation safety incidents, including a
centralized database, ensuring compliance with the Aircraft Rules, 1937, and
international best practices.
The PIL further sought a direction to Air India to provide
compensation to the families of AI-171 crash victims in accordance with the
Montreal Convention, 1999, and to offer ex-gratia payments or compensation to
passengers of AI-143 for distress and inconvenience caused by the safety
incident, as per applicable laws and industry standards.
On 12 June, the London-bound Air India flight, with 242 passengers
and crew on board, crashed moments after taking off from the Ahmedabad
International Airport, killing at least 260 people.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *