House gives final approval to Trump's big tax bill, sends it to him to sign
The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed.
PTI
-
Passage of Trump's big tax bill by House Republicans (PTI)
Washington, 4 July
House Republicans propelled President Donald Trump's USD 4.5
trillion tax breaks and spending cuts bill to final congressional passage
Thursday, overcoming multiple setbacks to approve his signature second-term
policy package before a Fourth of July deadline.
The tight roll call, 218-214, came at a potentially high political
cost, with two Republicans joining all Democrats opposed. GOP leaders worked
overnight and the president himself leaned on a handful of sceptics to drop
their opposition and send the bill to him to sign into law.
Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York delayed voting by holding the floor for more than eight hours with a record-breaking speech
against the bill.
“We have a big job to finish,” said House Speaker Mike Johnson,
R-La. “With one big beautiful bill we are going to make this country stronger,
safer and more prosperous than ever before.”
The outcome delivers a milestone for the president, by his Friday
goal, and for his party,. It was a long-shot effort to compile a lengthy list
of GOP priorities into what they called his “one big beautiful bill,” an
800-plus page measure. With Democrats unified in opposition, the bill will
become a defining measure of Trump's return to the White House, aided by
Republican control of Congress.
Tax breaks and safety net
cuts
At its core, the package's priority is USD 4.5 trillion in tax
breaks enacted in 2017 during Trump's first term that would expire if Congress
failed to act, along with new ones. This includes allowing workers to deduct
tips and overtime pay, and a USD 6,000 deduction for most older adults earning
less than USD 75,000 a year.
There's also a hefty investment, some USD 350 billion, in national
security and Trump's deportation agenda and to help develop the “Golden Dome”
defensive system over the US.
To help offset the lost tax revenue, the package includes USD 1.2
trillion in cutbacks to the Medicaid health care and food stamps, largely by
imposing new work requirements, including for some parents and older people,
and a major rollback of green energy tax credits.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates the package
will add USD 3.3 trillion to the deficit over the decade and 11.8 million more
people will go without health coverage.
"This was a generational opportunity to deliver the most
comprehensive and consequential set of conservative reforms in modern history,
and that's exactly what we're doing,” said Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, the
House Budget Committee chairman.
Democrats united against
'ugly bill'
Democrats unified against the bill as a tax giveaway to the rich
paid for on the backs of the working class and most vulnerable in society, what
they called “trickle down cruelty.” Tensions ran high in the chamber.
Jeffries began the speech at 4.53 am EDT and finished at 1.37 pm
EDT, 8 hours, 44 minutes later, a record, as he argued against what he called
Trump's “big ugly bill.”
“We're better than this,” Jeffries said, who used a leader's
prerogative for unlimited debate and read letter after letter from Americans
writing about their reliance of the health care programs.
“I never thought that I'd be on the House floor saying that this
is a crime scene," Jeffries said.
“It's a crime scene, going after the health, and the safety, and
the well-being of the American people."
And as Democrats, he said, "We want no part of it.”
Hauling the package through the Congress has been difficult from
the start. Republicans have struggled mightily with the bill nearly every step
of the way quarreling in the House and Senate, and often succeeding only by the
narrowest of margins: just one vote.
The Senate passed the package days earlier with Vice President JD
Vance breaking the tie vote. The slim majority in the House left Republicans
little room for defections.
Political costs of saying no
Despite their discomfort with various aspects of the sprawling
package, in some ways it became too big to fail — in part because Republicans
found it difficult to buck Trump.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *