CM rebuts opposition charge over MUDA ''scam'', denies role
Siddaramaiah accused the opposition BJP and JD(S) of making politically motivated allegations against him out of "hate and revenge"
PTI
-
Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah
Bengaluru, 26 July
Karnataka Chief Minister
Siddaramaiah on Friday strongly defended himself in connection with the alleged
fraudulent allotment of sites to land losers by Mysuru Urban Development
Authority (MUDA), including to his wife Parvathi, and asserted that neither he
or his family has any role in it.
He accused the opposition BJP and
JD(S) of making politically motivated allegations against him out of "hate
and revenge", with an intention to "put a black mark on his
image", as they are unable to digest that he has become Chief Minister for
the second time.
Siddaramaiah also said that the
Governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot has sought a report from the government regarding
the alleged irregularities in MUDA and a report will be sent "as
everything is totally and absolutely legal."
"Is there any role of either
mine or my wife or my brother-in-law in this? Our land was taken (by MUDA) ,
sites were made and they were allocated to others. So MUDA gave us (alternate
sites) as given to others, after accepting their mistake. What is illegality in
this? " Siddaramaiah asked while giving a detailed statement to the
allegations made against him by BJP-JD(S).
Speaking to reporters here, he
said: "Absolutely my role is not there. It is totally and absolutely
legal. BJP and JD(S) are indulging in false propaganda for the sake of politics
and trying to defame me personally, unable to digest that I have become the
Chief Minister for the second time, and as they have lost the 2023 assembly
polls and faced a setback in 2024 Lok Sabha polls."
It is alleged that compensatory
sites were allotted to Siddaramaiah's wife in an upmarket area in Mysuru, which
had higher property value as compared to the location of her land which had
been "acquired" by the MUDA.
The MUDA had allotted plots to
Parvathi under a 50:50 ratio scheme in lieu of 3.16 acres of her land, where
MUDA developed a residential layout. The controversial scheme envisages
allotting 50 per cent of developed land to the land loser in lieu of
undeveloped land acquired for forming layouts.
Urban Development Minister Byrathi
Suresh said several leaders from the opposition parties or their family members
or relatives or friends or supporters have also been given alternative sites,
and they included Union Minister and JD(S) state chief H D Kumaraswamy, BJP MLC
Manje Gowda, JD(S) MLA and former Minister G T Deve Gowda, BJP MLC and former
Minister H Vishwanath, former JD(S) MLA Sa Ra Mahesh.
"I'm not saying all of this
was done wrongly, it has been done in accordance with law, as given in this
case (to CM's wife).... We will give these documents to the judicial commission
and they will look into these allotments," he said, adding that
Kumaraswamy has even sought for more alternative sites recently stating that
his lands were acquired, and it is being looked into.
Pointing out that he first became
MLA in 1983 and Minister in 1984, Siddaramaiah said: "as legislator,
Minister, Deputy Chief Minister and Chief Minister, I have been in politics for
more than 40 years, it is 40 years since I became Minister first, so far there
is no single black spot on my name (image). My political life is an open
book."
Responding to charges questioning
the legality of 3.16 acres of his wife's land that was acquired by MUDA, he
said, BJP and JD(S) say this land attracts provisions of Karnataka Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands) Act,
known as the PTCL Act, which is "totally false", as Ninga alias
Jawara, the earlier owner of the land, had purchased it through auction in
1935.
The 3.16 acres is a "self
acquired" property, which later came to Ninga's third son Devaraj and he
became the absolute owner of the property with the consent of other family
members and siblings, he said. From him, Mallikarjuna Swamy (CM's wife
Parvathi's brother) acquired this land. "As this is a self acquired
property and not a grant by the government, it doesn't attract PTCL Act."
Further noting that this land was
acquired by MUDA and preliminary notification was issued in 1992 and final
notification in 1997, the CM said, based on Devaraj's application the land was
subsequently denotified on the recommendation of a government committee, along
with 19 other cases.
In 2004 Devaraj sold the property
to Mallikarjuna Swamy and in 2005 it was converted from agricultural land to
non agricultural, he said, adding, in 2010 Mallikarjuna Swamy gifted the land
to his sister Parvathi.
MUDA subsequently, without the
consent of the land owner, formed sites on it and distributed to others,
following which Parvathi moved an application to MUDA in 2014 seeking
alternative sites in lieu of her land utilised by it illegally, he said and
add: "we did not ask alternative sites in any particular area. MUDA
accepted its mistake and allotted 14 sites of different dimensions in
Vijayanagara 3rd and 4th stage to Parvathi in lieu of their land utilised by
it."
Sites allotted to Parvathi totaled
to 38,284 sq ft, as against 3.16 acres of her land utilised, which measures to
a total 1.48 lakh sq ft, and at the time of allotment of site the MUDA board
had members from all parties including BJP and JD(S), he said, adding, many
were allotted sites like this under 50:50 formula, including in Vijayanagara.
The CM also said he had not
mentioned this 3.16 acre in his 2013 election affidavit, but had subsequently
mentioned it to Lokayukta.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *