SC closes contempt plea in minor’s 30-week pregnancy termination case
Justice Nagarathna said if AIIMS refuses MTP in such cases, women may risk their lives by turning to unqualified doctors.
PTI
-
Justice Nagarathna said such directions in pregnancy termination cases are not easy, but the court must take a decision (PTI)
New Delhi, 4 May
The Supreme Court on Monday closed contempt proceedings against the Centre and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences in a case relating to the termination of a 30-week pregnancy of a minor girl.
A bench of
Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan was informed by Additional Solicitor
General Aishwarya Bhati that its 24 April order has been complied with.
"We
do not find any reason to consider this contempt petition any further. Hence, the contempt proceedings against the respondents are dropped," the bench
said.
Justice
Nagarathna orally remarked that passing such a direction is not easy, but the court has
to make a decision in such matters.
"It's
not easy for us here. There is nobody who is winning, nobody is losing this.
But then we have to take a decision without emotion. I hope it doesn't come to
this again in the sense that we don't want any more unwanted pregnancies coming
for termination," she said.
Justice
Nagarathna said if AIIMS does not take the responsibility of carrying out
Medical Termination of Pregnancy in such case, then the woman's life would be at
risk as she would turn to unqualified doctors.
Observing
that unwanted pregnancies, including those arising out of consensual
relationships, were increasing, Justice Nagarathna said that in many cases, the
shock of the minor and the delay in informing family members leads to late
decisions, after which private clinics refuse assistance, and the patient
ultimately approaches AIIMS.
"The
tendency nowadays in society of these unwanted pregnancies is on the rise. You
see what happens – They don't inform, here the mother (of the minor girl) was detected. By the time a decision is taken in the family, it will be seven
months. You see, it is very difficult.
"The
shock of the girl who is not married and is a minor having become pregnant, and
the decision of the family on what to do. Either a lacuna in the law or a tendency
in the society. Somebody has to answer it," Justice Nagarathna said.
The top
court was hearing a contempt petition filed by the mother of a 15-year-old minor
girl against AIIMS and the Centre for non-compliance with its order allowing her to
terminate a 30-week pregnancy.
A minor
child cannot be forced to bear a pregnancy, the top court on 30 April said
while pulling up the Centre and asking it to amend the law to permit rape survivors to terminate unwanted pregnancies even beyond 20 weeks.
A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi had taken strong exception
to a plea by AIIMS seeking to set aside the apex court order allowing a
15-year-old girl to medically terminate her 30-week pregnancy.
Observing
that the reproductive autonomy of a mother-to-be must be accorded the highest
importance, a bench of Justices BV Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan had allowed the
15-year-old to medically terminate her pregnancy of 30 weeks.
The top court also dismissed the review plea filed by AIIMS and held that medical termination of unwanted pregnancy cannot be rejected on grounds of the advanced stage of pregnancy or normalcy of the foetus.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




