Cong slams BJP after Vijay Shah hoists Tricolour at R-Day event
Shah allegedly made offensive remarks about Colonel Qureshi while addressing a public event on Halma in 2025.
PTI
-
Vijay Shah walked away after extending Republic Day wishes when asked about the Congress’s objections (PTI)
Indore, 26 Jan
The Congress on Monday targeted the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party in Madhya Pradesh after Minister Vijay Shah hoisted the Tricolour at a Republic Day event despite being hauled up by the courts for his derogatory remarks against Indian Army Colonel Sofiya Qureshi.
On 19 January, the Supreme Court directed the Mohan Yadav government to decide
within two weeks on granting sanction to prosecute Shah for his controversial
remarks against Colonel Qureshi. Earlier, the Madhya Pradesh High Court had
reprimanded Shah for making "derogatory remarks" and using
"indecent language" against Colonel Qureshi and ordered the police to
file an FIR against him.
Shah,
the state's Tribal Affairs, Public Asset Management and Bhopal Gas Tragedy
Relief and Rehabilitation minister, hoisted the national flag at the ceremonial
Republic Day parade held in his home district, Khandwa.
Slamming
the ruling dispensation, MP Congress chief Jitu Patwari, said, "Shah should
have been immediately removed from his ministerial post following the Supreme
Court's directive, but the BJP made Shah hoist the flag on Republic Day. This
is challenging the Constitution. The failure to get Shah to resign raises
questions about the working style of Chief Minister Mohan Yadav."
Leader of Opposition Umang Singhar also objected to Shah hoisting the Tricolour.
"The
BJP has become a shameless party. Whatever action has been shown (by the party)
against Vijay Shah is merely a formality. The Supreme Court and High Court are
being forced to take suo-motu cognisance in several matters due to the inaction
of the state government," Singhar told reporters in Bhopal.
Meanwhile,
Deputy Chief Minister Jagdish Devda declined to comment when asked about the
attack by the Congress.
"I
think we should just accept congratulations and best wishes on this occasion
(Republic Day)," Devda told reporters after attending the main Republic
Day celebrations in Indore.
The
BJP's state media cell, in charge of Ashish Agrawal, however, defended Shah for
hoisting the national flag at an official event.
"The
matter (related to Shah) is already in the court's cognizance and everything is
being done as per the court's directive. Action cannot be taken as per the
Congress," he claimed.
When the
media in Khandwa tried to obtain Shah's response to the Congress's objections,
he just walked away after wishing the people on the occasion of Republic Day.
Last
year, Shah came under fire after a video, which was circulated widely, showed
him allegedly making objectionable remarks against Colonel Qureshi, who gained
nationwide prominence along with another woman officer, Wing Commander Vyomika
Singh, during the media briefings on Operation Sindoor.
Shah
allegedly made the offensive remarks about Colonel Qureshi while addressing a
public event on 'Halma' (a tribal tradition of collective labour and community
participation) on 12 May 2025, in Raikunda village in Indore district.
After
the Madhya Pradesh High Court took suo motu cognisance of his remarks, an FIR
was registered against the cabinet minister at the Manpur police station in the
district.
The FIR
was registered under BNS sections 152 (an act endangering the sovereignty,
unity and integrity of India), 196 (1) (B) (an act having an adverse effect on
the mutual harmony between different communities, which causes or is likely to
cause a breach of public peace) and 197 (1) (C) (speaking about a member of a
community, which harms the mutual harmony between different
communities).
Later,
Shah expressed regret by claiming he respected Colonel Qureshi more than his
own sister.
On 28 July 2025, the Supreme Court had pulled up Shah for not placing a public apology over his remarks on record against Colonel Qureshi, saying he was "testing the court's patience".
It had pointed out that the minister's conduct was prompting it to doubt his intentions and bona fides.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




