Govt ready to discuss SIR but Opposition can't set timeline: Rijiju
Opposition MPs intensified their protest in Rajya Sabha after CP Radhakrishnan rejected their notices for discussion.
PTI
-
Meanwhile, many Congress leaders protested out the Parliament against SIR (PTI)
New Delhi, 2 Dec
The Indian government on Tuesday expressed willingness to
discuss the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the Rajya
Sabha, but Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju said the Opposition
cannot dictate the timeline for the debate.
The statement came as Opposition MPs intensified their
protest in the Upper House after Chairman CP Radhakrishnan rejected their
notices under Rule 267, citing failure to meet procedural requirements.
Despite continued sloganeering during Zero Hour, members
refused to yield to the Chair's requests for order.
Leader of the Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge insisted these were urgent matters, claiming nearly 28 people had died during the SIR
exercise.
"People are dying. And SIR is going fast... This is an
urgent matter. To save democracy... I want discussion should take place now
only. And in the interest of democracy, in the interest of citizens, in the
interest of the country," he said.
Leader of the House JP Nadda said the Parliamentary Affairs
Minister had indicated the previous day that he would return with a response.
"Today, I am told by the Parliamentary Affairs Minister, that very soon a
meeting is going to take place with the Opposition leaders, and accordingly, we
will decide."
Rijiju said he would engage with Opposition leaders from
different parties, both formally and informally, but requested that they should
not impose "timeline conditions".
"In Parliamentary democracy, we have to engage in dialogue,
we have to engage in discussion. There are many issues in the country. You
should not undermine one issue, and take up another issue. All the issues are
important," he said.
He also also took a swipe at the Opposition, saying,
"You are not able to win elections, people do not trust you, and you are
venting your anger in Parliament. This is not right at all."
He added that while the government was ready for discussion,
a meeting was necessary first.
"In a democracy, there is a platform of elections with
the people. We said yesterday too that we are ready to discuss and you should
at least hold consultations. But, they try to fix the time, saying the
government should tell now. This is not right," he said.
Earlier, Kharge raised procedural concerns, stating that the
tradition of reading out the names and subjects of notices given under Rule 267
was not being followed.
"Just like the adjournment motion is given in the lower
house, the same thing is done there and here too. But suddenly, the person who
has given the notice, his name is not read, his subject is also not read. This
is not good," Kharge said.
He also complained about the Chair's attention being
directed only toward the treasury benches, saying, "Earlier, they used to
see one side, only Nadda. Now, sir, you are seeing only this table down and you
are not seeing us."
The chairman responded by asking how he could listen to
everyone when the House was not in order, adding that he had asked the
Parliamentary Affairs Minister to respond and the minister had sought time.
The Chair concluded by noting that the minister had agreed
to discuss with Opposition leaders and suggested proceeding with listed
business until the consultations concluded.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *




