Fear of surveillance assault on press: HC
Justice Ilanthiraiyan emphasised that the seizure violated Section 15(2) of the Press Council Act, which protects journalists' sources as privileged communication.
PTI

Chennai, 6 Feb
Madras High Court has observed that press freedom and privacy were allies and
that the fear of surveillance is an assault on the media, which is the fourth
pillar of democracy. Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan issued the ruling while disposing
of petitions filed by the Chennai Press Club and three reporters, who sought to
prevent the Special Investigation Team (SIT) from harassing them during an
investigation into the leak of an FIR related to a sexual assault case at Anna
University.
The judge condemned the SIT for seizing the petitioners'
mobile phones and attempting to access their personal data under the guise of
investigation. Justice Ilanthiraiyan emphasised that the seizure violated
Section 15(2) of the Press Council Act, which protects journalists' sources as
privileged communication. He noted that the petitioners had neither uploaded
the FIR nor shared it on social media, making the phone seizures unnecessary
and unlawful.
The court also pointed out the failure of the SIT to
investigate those directly responsible for uploading the FIR or to issue
summons to them, instead focusing solely on the journalists. Justice
Ilanthiraiyan highlighted that the police had claimed technical glitches caused
the FIR to be uploaded, but this did not absolve them of responsibility. The
judge further criticised the uploading of the FIR, noting that the Supreme
Court's guidelines prohibit public access to FIRs in sensitive cases, such as
those involving sexual offences.
While acknowledging the SIT's right to summon the
journalists for questioning, the court stressed that the investigators must not
harass them or ask irrelevant questions. The judge directed the SIT to complete
its inquiry by 10 February and return the seized devices to the petitioners
without delay. Furthermore, the SIT was forbidden from probing into the
petitioners' personal details, including their friends, relatives, or
confidential sources.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *