SC issues notice to Centre on HC verdict on quota limit
On 29 July, the top court had refused to stay the high court order that set aside the amended reservation laws in Bihar that enabled the Nitish Kumar government to raise quotas 50 per cent to 65 per cent
PTI
-
"Issue notice and tag with the pending pleas," the CJI said
New Delhi, 6 Sept
The Supreme Court on Friday sought
responses from the Centre and the state government on a plea of Rashtriya
Janata Dal against a Patna High Court order setting aside the amended
reservation laws in Bihar that had led to raising of quotas for Dalits, tribals
and backward classes from 50 per cent to 65 percent.
A bench comprising Chief Justice DY
Chandrachud, Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice Manoj Misra took note of the
submissions of senior advocate P Wilson, appearing for RJD, that the plea
needed to be decided. "Issue notice and tag with the pending pleas,"
the CJI said.
On 29 July, the top court, while
hearing other similar 10 pleas, had refused to stay the high court order that
set aside the amended reservation laws in Bihar that enabled the Nitish Kumar
government to raise quotas 50 per cent to 65 per cent.
The bench, however, had agreed to
hear the petitions of the Bihar government against the verdict. The state
government has also moved the top court against the high court judgement.
In its 20 June verdict, the high
court declared that the amendments, passed unanimously by the state's bicameral
legislature in November last year, were "ultra vires" of the
Constitution, "bad in law" and "violative of the equality
clause".
A division bench of the high court
had allowed a bunch of petitions challenging the Bihar Reservation of Vacancies
in Posts and Services (for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other
Backward Classes) (Amendment) Act, 2023 and the Bihar (in admission in educational
institutions) Reservation (Amendment) Act, 2023, while "leaving the
parties to suffer their respective costs".
In a detailed judgement running up
to 87 pages, the high court had made it clear that it saw "no extenuating
circumstance enabling the state to breach" the 50-per cent cap on
reservations laid down by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case.
"The state proceeded on the
mere proportion of the population of different categories as against their
numerical representation in government services and educational
institutions," the high court had pointed out.
The amendments had followed a caste
survey, which put the percentage of Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Extremely
Backward Classes (EBC) at a staggering 63 per cent of the state's total population,
while the SCs and STs were stated to have accounted for more than 21 per cent.
The exercise was undertaken by the
Bihar government after the Centre expressed its inability to carry out a fresh
head count of castes other than the SCs and STs, which was last held as part of
the 1931 Census.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *