Excise policy scam: SC defers till 5 Sept hearing on Kejriwal's pleas
A bench of justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan allowed the CBI to file its counter affidavit in the matter and gave two days' time to Kejriwal to file a rejoinder
PTI
-
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal
New Delhi, 23 Aug
The Supreme Court
on Friday deferred till 5 September hearing on Delhi Chief Minister Arvind
Kejriwal's pleas seeking bail and challenging the arrest by the CBI in the
alleged excise policy scam.
A bench of
justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan allowed the CBI to file its counter
affidavit in the matter and gave two days' time to Kejriwal to file a
rejoinder.
Senior advocate
Abhishek Singhvi, appearing for Kejriwal, said the CBI filed a counter
affidavit in only one of the pleas and it was served upon them at 8pm on
Thursday. ASG SV Raju said they will file the counter in another plea in one
week. The bench then posted the matter for further hearing on 5 September.
Kejriwal has filed
two separate petitions challenging denial of bail and against his arrest by the
CBI in the case. He has challenged the 5 August orders of the Delhi High Court.
On 14 August, the top court refused to grant interim bail to Kejriwal in the
case and sought a response from the probe agency on his plea challenging his
arrest. Kejriwal was arrested by the CBI on 26 June.
The Delhi High
Court had on 5 August upheld the arrest of the chief minister as legal, and
said there was no malice in the acts done by the CBI which was able to
demonstrate how the AAP supremo could influence witnesses who could muster the
courage to depose only after his arrest.
The high court had
asked him to move the trial court for regular bail in the CBI case. The high
court had noted that the loop of evidence against the chief minister got closed
after collection of relevant evidence following his arrest by the CBI and it
cannot be said that it was without any justifiable reason or illegal.
It said Kejriwal
is not an ordinary citizen but a distinguished recipient of the Magsaysay Award
and the convenor of the Aam Aadmi Party. "The control and the influence
which he has on the witnesses is prima facie borne out from the fact that these
witnesses could muster the courage to be a witness only after the arrest of the
petitioner, as highlighted by the special prosecutor.
"Also, it
establishes that the loop of evidence against the petitioner got closed after
collection of relevant evidence after his arrest. No malice whatsoever, can be
gathered from the acts of the respondent (CBI)," the high court had said.
The high court had
dismissed Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest, saying it was only after
sufficient evidence was collected and sanction was obtained in April, 2024 that
the agency proceeded with further probe against him.
It had noted that
the links to the crime extended even to Punjab but material witnesses were not
coming forward due to the influence exercised by Kejriwal by virtue of his
position. It was only after he got arrested that the witnesses came forward to
record their statements, the high court had said.
The chief
minister, who was arrested by the ED on 21 March, was granted bail by the trial
court in the money laundering case on June 20. However, the trial court's order
was stayed by the high court.
On 12 July, the
top court granted him interim bail in the money laundering case. The excise
policy was scrapped in 2022 after the Delhi lieutenant governor ordered a CBI
probe into alleged irregularities and corruption involving its formulation and
execution. According to the CBI and the ED, irregularities were committed while
modifying the excise policy and undue favours extended to licence holders.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *