Opposition calls Waqf bill 'draconian'
The Opposition on Thursday said the bill is an attack on the Constitution and is aimed at targeting Muslims. They also urged the government to withdraw the bill
PTI
-
Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju sought leave to introduce the bill. PHOTO: PTI
New Delhi, 8 Aug
The Opposition on Thursday strongly
protested against the introduction of the Waqf (Amendment) Bill in the Lok
Sabha, with several INDIA bloc MPs calling it an attack on the Constitution and
aimed at targeting Muslims. They also urged the government to withdraw the
bill.
Soon after Union Minority Affairs
Minister Kiren Rijiju sought leave to introduce the bill, Congress MP KC
Venugopal -- who had submitted notice to oppose its introduction -- accused the
government of violating freedom of religion and attacking the federal system through
it. "This is a draconian law and a fundamental attack on the
Constitution," Venugopal said.
He said people taught the BJP a
lesson for its divisive politics but it was continuing with the same, keeping
in mind the upcoming assembly elections in states such as Haryana and
Maharashtra. "It is a direct attack on freedom of religion … Next you will
go for Christians, then Jains," he said. The people of India will not buy
this kind of divisive politics now, Venugopal asserted.
Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh
Yadav said the bill was being introduced to appease the BJP's hardcore
supporters. "What is the point of including non-Muslims in Waqf boards
when this is not done in other religious bodies?" Yadav asked. "The
truth is that the BJP has brought this bill to appease its hardcore
supporters," the Kannauj MP said.
Samajawadi Party MP Mohibullah
Nadvi said the bill was against freedom of religion. He said appointing
non-Muslims in the Central Waqf Council and other such bodies was violative of
the rights of Muslims.
Opposing its introduction,
Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Sudip Bandhopadhyay said the bill was divisive,
anti-constitutional and anti-federalism. "This is against the
Constitution, a religious minority and federalism. It shuns justice in every
possible way," DMK MP Kanimozhi said. "It is a direct violation of
Article 30, which deals with minorities to administer their institutions. This
bill targets a particular religious group…," she said.
Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) -
Sharadchandra Pawar MP Supriya Sule said her party opposed the bill as it was
against a particular minority community. "Look at what is happening in
Bangladesh, there is so much pain … It is the moral duty of a country to
protect minorities," Sule said. "The government should clarify the
intent and the timing of the bill. We object, withdraw this bill … Let's
discuss it and then bring a bill that is fair and just," she added.
The Indian Union Muslim League's
(IUML) ET Mohammed Basheer said the bill was violative of articles 14, 15, 25
26 and 30 of the Constitution. He alleged it was part of the government's
"dirty agenda" and called the bill divisive. If this bill is passed,
the Waqf system will collapse, he said. He also claimed that the bill would
encourage encroachment on Waqf land. "Your intention is to communalise,
put Hindus and Muslims in compartments … We will not let this happen,"
Basheer said.
All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul
Muslimeen chairperson Asaduddin Owaisi claimed that the House did not have the
competence to make the amendments. "It is a grave attack on the basic
structure of the Constituion as it violates the principle of judicial
independence and separation of powers," he said. "You are enemies of
Muslims and this bill is evidence of that," Owaisi said.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *