SC asks Centre to frame policy on menstrual leave for women
The top court said the issue related to policy and was not an issue for the courts to look into.
PTI
New Delhi, 8 July
The Supreme Court on Monday
directed the Centre to frame a model policy on menstrual leave for women
employees by holding consultations with states and other stakeholders.
A bench comprising Chief Justice DY
Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra said the issue related
to policy and was not an issue for the courts to look into. Moreover, such a
decision from a court on granting such leave to women may prove to be
counterproductive and “detrimental” to the cause as employers may avoid
employing them.
How will the leave encourage more
women to be part of the workforce, the court asked the petitioner and said
mandating such leave will lead to women "being shunned from the
workforce". "...we do not want that,” the bench said.
“This is actually a government
policy aspect and not for the courts to look into, " it said. “Petitioner
says that a representation was submitted to the Centre in May 2023. Since the
issues raise multifarious objectives of state policy, there is no reason for
this court to intervene in light of our previous order,” it said.
The bench, however, permitted
lawyer Rakesh Khanna, appearing for petitioner and lawyer Shailendra Tripathi,
to move the secretary of the Ministry of Women and Child Development and
Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati. “We request the secretary to look
into the matter at the policy level and take a decision after consulting all
stakeholders and see if a model policy can be framed,” it ordered.
The court made it clear that that
the consultation process of the Centre will not come in the way of states if
they take any steps in this regard. The top court had earlier disposed of a
plea seeking menstrual pain leave for women students and working women across
the country.
It had then said that since the
issue falls under the policy domain, a representation can be made to the
Centre. The senior lawyer said that till date no decision has been taken by the
Centre.
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *