Gujarat asks petitioners to explain ‘selective interest’ over fake encounters case

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state, told the bench that encounters have taken place in other states also.

PTI

https://salarnews.in/public/uploads/images/newsimages/maannewsimage18012024_193703_supreme court.jpg
  • Supreme Court

New Delhi, 18 Jan

Gujarat government told Supreme Court that the petitioners who have sought a probe into the alleged fake encounters in the state from 2002 to 2006 must explain the reasons for "selective public interest" in raising the issue.

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Sandeep Mehta was hearing two separate pleas filed in 2007 by senior journalist BG Verghese, and noted Javed Akhtar and Shabnam Hashmi, seeking a probe into the alleged fake encounters. Verghese died in 2014.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the state, told the bench that encounters have taken place in other states also. "The petitioners will have to satisfy the court about their selective public interest," Mehta asserted.

The apex court had earlier appointed a monitoring authority headed by former top court judge Justice H S Bedi which had probed 17 alleged fake encounter cases in Gujarat from 2002 to 2006.

The committee, which had submitted its report in a sealed cover in 2019, recommended prosecution of police officials in three out of the 17 cases it probed. During the hearing on Thursday, advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for one of the petitioners, said the committee report has already come before the court.

"All that is needed to be done is to prosecute those persons who have been identified in the report," he said, adding the panel has come to a conclusion in three cases.
The bench posted the pleas for hearing after two weeks.

In its final report filed in the apex court, the Justice Bedi committee had said three persons -- Sameer Khan, Kasam Jafar and Haji Ismail -- were prima facie killed in fake encounters by police.

It had indicted a total of nine police officials, including three inspector rank officers. It, however, did not recommend prosecution of any IPS officer.

On 9 January, 2019, a bench headed by then Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi had rejected the Gujarat government's plea to maintain confidentiality of the final report of the committee and ordered that it be given to petitioners.

The panel had also dealt with 14 other cases which related to alleged fake encounter killings of Mithu Umar Dafer, Anil Bipin Misra, Mahesh, Rajeshwar, Kashyap Harpalsingh Dhaka, Salim Gagji Miyana, Jala Popat Devipujak, Rafiksha, Bheema Maanda Mer, Jogindrasinh Khatansing, Ganesh Khunte, Mahendra Jadav, Subhash Bhaskar Nayyar and Sanjay. 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *